The full agreement will be shown at a later date. The Agreement was prepared at No 5 Chamber by Mr DAVID MICHELL and Mr Abrol being MAF's barrister and Solicitors. It should be noted that there is no covering letter and the agreement left undated. This was because there was needed to be some adjustments. This never took place.
SM were TDSF and CJWF solicitors which we had to disengage due to MAF solicitors letter to our auctioners threating an injunction, Consequently ruining our auction.
The AGREEMENT
Mr MICHELL and Mr ABROL wrote it and broke it almost immediately in numerous places.
Agreement Sections 15 -17. If all else failed. At Section 15
'If the valuer needs to be instructed, then the identity will be agreed by Meridian and SM by 4 pm 18th March 2022 in default of which THE PRESIDENT OF RICS shall be asked to Nominate an appropriate valuer.' That was never done
Section 16
The parties will by 4pm 25th March (or within 7 days of a nomination by the president of RICS)instruct the valuer either by an agreed joint letter of Instruction or seperate letter of instruction. The Valuers fees will be met equally by each of the Parties. For the avoidence of doubt the valuer will be Instructed as an Expert (whose derermination shall be binding on the parties) to decide:
a)The valuation of CPL and DFL
b) (If necessary) the value of CPL and DFL if (hypothetically) further assets Proposed by Christopher and Jonathan were transferred into either CPL or DFL and
c)If necessary, the identity of the assets of HDL (or it's subsidiaries) which should be trannsferred into DFL or CP to achieve the said £700,000 valuation.
17)Within 14 days of the later of:-
a)The agreement of the Tranactional Documents
b)The agreement of the Parties as to any assets that need to be transferred into CPL and/or (as provided for above) or expert determination of the same, the parties will complete the Tranactional Documents.
Despite at least 5 times to trying to negotiate with MAF he refused. Mr Abrol was adament that MAF figures were correct. He did not use his best endevours to agree any figures.
MAF's FRAUD (and his son Mathew Fell) under valued the assets by hundred's of thousands of pounds.
Where does that leave Mr MITCHELL and Mr ABROL? Is that Professional Negligence?
Why did MAF or Mathew Fell value the company and as importantly why did Victor Young prepare accounts. He was MAF's Accountant's and as such would be disqualified and why did JQPF and TDSF agree the figures. They were in on the fraud.
Why did JPQF solicitors allow this to happen. I suspect TDSF involment in this fraud was from his accounts done under threat from MAF and Mathew Fell. Remember TDSF and CJWF had disengage Sydney Mitchell solicitors


