As soon as TDSF and CJWF disengaged our solicitor Sydney Michell . TDSF was coerced into striking a deal with MAF putting all blame on to me.

TDSF has been assigned to liaise with (MAF or) Mathew Fell. TDSF knew the solicitors and exactly who had what property deeds over the years. I did ground rent valuations and the figures. So TDSF was mainly at MAF/Mathew Fell and Fell Estates Offices.

However, as soon as disengagement happened according to TDSF amongst other things Mr. Abrol eventually struck a deal which prevented me from running our Companies. Being all the costs were to be put to me and the shortfall on MAF fraudulent stock values. This is borne out in in the court papers on the sixth May 2022 The whole thing was a Lie. TDSF and CJWF were not in disagreement. Tim was coerced little or no choice

Mr. Abrol gushing praises on TDSF and CJWF was the uncooperative villain. which was not true. It was stop CJWF stopping the companies from trading. As was stopping the Bond Wolfe Auction previously. Meridians Mr. Abrol did not know of the reversal

So Mr. Abrol dictated a letter to Mathew Fell. To go to the Bank and solicitors. The address was TDSF home address I believe (not Company Letter Head)but the reference was given as MAF and sent from Mathew Fell's email. It was not sent from TDSF email. So TDSF was to save £150,000 and his house. Tim unusually sent his instruction by fax on company letter headings.

20 April 2022 HSBC (Instructions from yesterday 19 April)

'This was withdrawn as we were advised of a dispute between yourselves.'

AND UPON the Second Defendant indicating that he accepts the net global value of the Dennis Feil Companies of 1456.1 18.39 contained in the Claimant's Witness Statemenr dared 26th May 2022 ("the valuation

The coercion continued:

TDSF is part of the Fraud however I believe he threatened and coerced into agreeing with MAF. (Similar to the arbitration where the fraudulent contract was signed on the understanding that there were to be amendments i.e. the final details to be ironed out between the solicitors. This never happened. See D2 AGREEMENT) No dates or an accompanying letter was attached and extra documents attached to make it appear they were part of the agreement. actwe were at the arbitration