As soon as TDSF and CJWF disengaged our solicitor Sydney Michell . TDSF was coerced into striking a deal (15 March 2021) with MAF putting all blame on to me. Mathew Fell and Fell Estates were to benefit the most.
TDSF has been assigned to liaise with (MAF or) Mathew Fell. TDSF knew the solicitors and exactly who had what property deeds over the years. I did ground rent valuations and the figures. So TDSF was mainly at MAF/Mathew Fell and Fell Estates Offices.
However, as soon as disengagement happened according to TDSF Mr. Abrol struck a deal which prevented CJWF from running all companies. Being all the costs were to be put to me and the shortfall based on MAF fraudulent stock values. This is borne out in in the court papers on the 6 May 2022 The whole thing was a Lie. TDSF and CJWF were not in disagreement. Tim was coerced with little or no choice. He was frantic about losing his house,
Mr. Abrol gushing praises on TDSF and CJWF was the uncooperative villain. which was not true. It was stop CJWF and stopping the companies from trading. As was stopping the Bond Wolfe Auction previously. (MAF also called to Bond Wolfe and a letter/email from Mr. Abrol threatening an injunction Meridians Mr. Abrol did not know of the reversal. So it was spelled out that TDSF would be getting the same treatment as CJWF i.e.sharing the costs.
So Mr. Abrol dictated a letter to Mathew Fell to go to the bank, solicitors, auctioners. The address was TDSF home address (not Company Letter Head)but the reference was given as MAF and sent from Mathew Fell's email. It was not even sent from TDSF email. It's not as if Mr Abrol, MAF or Mathew Fell don't know it. It's on Mr. Abrols letter, So TDSF was to save £150,000 (incl. £30,000 ex gracia) and his house. Tim unusually sent his instruction by fax on company letter headings.
20 April 2022 HSBC (Instructions from yesterday 19 April)
'This was withdrawn as we were advised of a dispute between yourselves.'
The coercion continued:
TDSF is part of the Fraud however I believe he threatened and coerced into agreeing with MAF, Mathew Fell and possibly Mr Abrol (Similar to the arbitration where the fraudulent contract was signed on the understanding that there were to be amendments i.e. the final details to be ironed out between the solicitors. This never happened. See D2 AGREEMENT) No dates or an accompanying letter was attached and extra documents (also undated) attached to make it appear they were part of the agreement.
Just as happened at Arbitration TDSF and CJWF were continuosly threated (Message from the Arbitrator that MAF would make sure CJWF was bankrupt and TDSF would lose his house. This was on a regular basis unless we surrended all 5 companies.
It was not as has been suggested that we made the offer on the Companies. MAF wanted all the companies (and particularly Speedwell Estates Ltd. The freehold ground rent company.
As soon as we disengaged our solicitors threats were as usual made. TDSF was then offered a deal which got him off the hook and put it all on me. It also to closed the companies.
We has just disengaged our solicitors, Mr. Abrol dictated the letter to Mathew Fell (or secretary).
RENAGED ON THE AGREEMENT
No Recovery of Costs of Cost from TDSF
Clear understanding agreeing within the compamies
15 March Mathew Fell
In accordance with TDSF instruction (Disputes version.TDSF under cercion. TDSF said instruction and format were Mr, Abrols he dictated letter, TDSF as materially misled as to the contact at the time.
DFP/CPL (It covered the other 3 Companies as well HD/MV/SE No sales of Assets but assets contacts were at double MAF fraidulemt Value
...it was in flagrant breach of A.) the Settlement Agreement B). Your undertaking
Offered for Quick Sale at Bargain Prices Prices. In all cases they were at substancialy higher prices and at of those at double.
Why were these letters so importanant if there was already a valid mechanism to stop the companies from trading?
From the first case there were signed documents on which CJWF and TDSF were threatened to be sued on the companies unless the we signed authorties effectively closing the companies downl.
21 days notice for sales, no remuniation or dividends. That case was where MAF and CJWF were joint executors. It was also at the start of Covid 2021. Completed under threat. This a continuing theme throughout.
Mr Mitchel It is claimed that those agreements (MA1) are still in place. They are not, They were superceeded by the agreement which MAF/Mathew Fell and his substancial legal team broke.
The Agreement is always in all correspondence. If the agreement from March 2020 is still good why was it necessary to get TDSF to sign letters on 14 March to the Bank, Auctioners and all Solicitors. It also includes '...the remander of the funds paid to the existing beneficiaries... that includes CJWF and TDSF which is in conflict with the Defunct Agreement of 3 February 2021.
We have a position were MAF/ Mathew Fell and Mr Abrol (and possibly Mr Mitchell?) thought they required additional restrictions under The Agreement to stop the companies from selling anything and the Directors taking any remuneration.
The Agreement did not stop us trading in the three Companies we were keeping or paying part in cash. Yet Mr Abrul alludes that the The Agreement says the opposit and says we cannot sell properties. TDSF was offered an incentive and signed the letters. It appears that Mr Abrol mislead TDSF which turned out to be a fraudulent misrepresentation and abuse of process. Simply, no auction no funds.
Why not simply produce the earlier document at the time to all parties listed in the letter. They did not at any time refer to it in any corresponsence. The first time it was pruduced in this case was on 6 May 2022. It had been superseded by the Agreement. Mr Mitchel in putting this document in Court is misleading and not valid as he contends.
It is now clear that the fraud, misrepresentations and leaving out clause 15 were all part of a plan. The unilateral breach of the agreement and it's downfall was as soon as the fraudulent stock values occured 4 March 2022.
